
The
Electronic Commerce Act, 2000
The
Electronic Commerce Act, 2000 (the Act) became law on the
20th September 2000. The Act is premised on two fundamental
principles. The first is to provide for the legal recognition
of electronic signatures, electronic writing and electronic
contracts so as to ensure that such electronic communications
would not be treated any differently under the law, than
traditional paper-based communications. The second founding
principle was to draft the legislation in as technologically
neutral a fashion as possible, so as to make it future-proof.
The
Act substantially implemented the provisions of the Electronic
Signatures Directive (1999/93/EC) and went some way towards
implementing the provisions of the Electronic Commerce Directive
(2000/31/EC). It is a straightforward piece of legislation
divided into four parts, with one Schedule. The Schedule
contains three annexes, which are taken directly from the
Electronic Signatures Directive.
Principal
Features
The
principal features of the Act are as follows:-
- Contracts
that are concluded electronically are valid and enforceable.
-
The provision of electronic information is legally effective.
-
Subject to complying with specific requirements and to
satisfying specific consent obligations, electronic signatures,
electronic witnessing and electronic sealing of documents
are given legal effect.
- The
evidential requirement for the maintenance of original
records may be satisfied by the maintenance of electronic
originals.
-
Any requirement that paper records be retained for given
periods may be satisfied by the retention of electronically
stored records.
-
There is provision for the acknowledgement of the receipt
of electronic communications.
- There
is provision for the establishment of time and place of
sending and receipt of electronic communications.
-
Electronic documents are admissible as evidence.
-
There is the provision for supervision, accreditation
and liability of certification service providers.
- There
is provision for domain name registration.
Exclusions
There
are exclusions from these principal features. Section 10
of the Act provides that the laws governing Wills, Trusts
and Powers of Attorney as well as the laws governing Affidavits
and sworn Declarations, as well as the rules, practices
and procedures of any Court or Tribunal, are excluded from
the operation of the Act, as is the law governing the transfer
of title of interests in real property. In respect of real
property, it should be noted that binding contracts can
nevertheless be concluded electronically.
These
exclusions are not intended to be permanent. The Act anticipates
that Regulations may be introduced in due course as and
when technological advances permit the gradual inclusion
of those matters, which have been excluded from the operation
of the Act.
Electronic
Information
The
Act provides at Section 9, that information cannot be denied
legal effect, force and validity simply because it is wholly
or partially in electronic form. In other words, information
that is provided on a web page or the contents of an e-mail,
cannot be discriminated against simply because they are
in electronic form.
The
Act provides that where the law requires that information
be given or permitted in writing that the requirement extends
to include electronic writing. However, there are three
conditions to be satisfied before information in electronic
form can be provided.
1.
The information in electronic form must be readable and
must be capable of being interpreted by the recipient.
2.
The recipient must consent to the provision of the information
in electronic form.
3.
Where the intended recipient is a public body, any information
technology, procedural or verification conditions which
the public body has designated, must be complied with.
Electronic
signatures
The
Act introduces the concept of an electronic signature and
the concept of an advanced electronic signature. In essence,
an electronic signature is an identifier, which analogous
to a hand-written signature, serves as the method of identifying
the originator. Its definition includes an advanced electronic
signature. The definition of electronic signature is sufficiently
broad to include the name of the sender contained at the
bottom of an e-mail.
An
advanced electronic signature is a more structured electronic
signature, designed to provide greater security to the sender
and the receiver. In essence, it contains irrefutable proof
that the document to which the signature is attached, has
not been manipulated since its dispatch and that the person
who has signed it, is who he says he is.
Section
13 of the Act provides that in all circumstances where a
document needs to be signed, so as to have legal effect,
it may be signed using an electronic signature where two
essential conditions are met.
These are as follows:-
1.
The person to whom the signature is addressed must first
consent to the use of the electronic signature.
2.
Where the intended recipient is a public body, its information
technology or procedural requirements must be complied with.
The
Act provides that subject to certain circumstances, a document
can be witnessed electronically and can be sealed electronically.
Electronic
Originals
The
Act also provides that electronic documents may be constituted
as electronic originals if certain requirements are met.
These are as follows:-
1.
Where there is an assurance that the information contained
within the document is complete and unadulterated.
2.
Where the information can be presented and displayed in
a manner so that it can be both read and understood.
3.
That the information must be readily accessible.
Section
18 of the Act provides that where there is an obligation
to retain or archive original documents for given periods
of time, such an obligation can be met by the retention
and storage of such documentation in electronic form.
Legal
effect to Electronic Communications
Section
19 of the Act provides that a contract that is concluded
electronically shall not be denied legal effect, validity
or enforceability simply because or partly because it is
in electronic form and has been concluded wholly or partly
by means of electronic communication. This section is designed
to underline and give certainty to the validity and enforceability
of contracts that are concluded electronically. The Act
is not prescriptive however. The parties are free to agree
how they shall conclude their contractual arrangements.
It is designed to facilitate the conclusion of electronic
contracts.
Receipt
of Electronic Communications
The
Act also addresses how electronic communications can be
received. Again, the Act is not prescriptive. The parties
to the contract are free to agree the form of acknowledgement
that is required for the purposes of the contract. It could
include for example, a return email or telephone call, but
could also include conduct.
However,
the Act does provide some guidance where the parties to
the contract have not agreed how the receipt of electronic
communications is to be acknowledged. There are three principal
rules.
These are as follows:-
1.
If the sender requires and acknowledgement but does not
indicate how the electronic communication should be acknowledged,
the recipient may acknowledge receipt of the electronic
communication by using another electronic communication
or some other form of communication, which includes conduct.
2.
If the sender seeks an acknowledgement of the receipt of
the electronic communication, then it will be treated as
if it was never sent, until such time as the sender receives
the acknowledgement.
3.
Where the sender seeks an acknowledgement of receipt of
the electronic communication as a condition of the communication
that it issues and if such is not received, then the electronic
communication would be treated as if it had never been sent.
Time
and Place of Sending and Receipt of Electronic Communications
It
is not hard to see why certainty as to the time and place
of sending and receipt of electronic communications could
be important in a contractual situation, especially in the
case of a dispute between the parties to the contract. In
circumstances where the contract does not provide for these
matters, then the following provisions apply:-
-
An electronic communication is deemed to have been sent
when it enters an information system outside the control
of the sender.
- An
electronic communication will be deemed to have been received
when either it enters the information system designated
by the receiver, or where not so designated by the receiver
when it comes to the attention of the receiver, i.e. when
the message appears on the receiver's email system.
- The
place of sending of the electronic communication will
be deemed to be the principal place of business of the
sender or the place where he or she ordinarily resides
in circumstances where he or she does not have a place
of business.
- The
place of receipt of the electronic communication will
be deemed to be the principal place of business of the
recipient, or in circumstances where the recipient does
not have a place of business, the place where he or she
ordinarily resides.
Admissibility
of Electronic Communications and Electronic Signatures
Section
22 of the Act authorises the admissibility of both electronic
communications and electronic signatures as evidence in
legal proceedings. In other words, electronic communications
and electronic signatures cannot be denied their evidentiary
value because they are in electronic form. Electronic communications
are now accorded the same evidential value as traditional
paper-based documentation.
Offences
The
Act creates the offences of using an electronic signature
for fraudulent purposes, or accessing, copying or altering
an electronic signature creation device of a certification
service provider without authorisation.
Existing
Legislation
The
Act provides that all electronic Contracts concluded within
the State will be subject to existing consumer protection
legislation and defamation laws. In addition, the Act does
not affect the operation of legislation concerning taxation
or other government taxes, the operation of the Companies
Acts, the operation of the Uncertified Security Regulations,
1996 or any substituted regulations or the operation of
the Criminal Evidence Act, 1992, the Consumer Credit Act,
1995 or the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations,
1995.
Certification
Service Provides
Part
3 of the Act sets out the provisions governing the operation
of Certification Service Providers (CSP's). These providers
are entities whose business is the issuing of certificates
or the provision of services relating to electronic signatures.
Section
29 of the Act does not impose any prior authorisation requirements
on CSP's wishing to set up in business and to offer their
services. However, Section 30 of the Act states that they
will be liable in pay compensation for damage caused to
any person who relies on the certificates issued by them
unless the CSP concerned can prove that it has not been
negligent in the provision of its service. In essence, the
CSP must ensure that the information that is provided in
the certificate is accurate at the time that the certificate
is issued.
Domain
Names
Part
4 of the Act deals with the regulations that may be introduced
in relation to domain name registration in Ireland. Section
31 allows the Minister for Public Enterprise to regulate
the provision of the "ie" domain name and to put
it on a statutory basis. Such regulations may prescribe
who will be the designated authority for the allocation
and registration of domain names within the ".ie"
TLD, the form of registration, the duration of the registration,
any renewal or revocation requirements, fees to be paid
and other necessary matters.
For
further information or general enquiries contact: -
Patrick Ryan
Email: pryan@kilroys.ie
Telephone: +3531-439 5600
Fax: +3531-439 5601/439 5602
© Kilroys Solicitors 2002

|